Makeovers Aren't Necessary

One part that stood out to me in the foreword of the Bluest Eye was the time the author stated that her friend wanted to have blue eyes.  That got me thinking of a scientific fact I heard a couple of years ago: we all have blue eyes.  The only difference between those having blue eyes and those not is that the latter have a thin layer of pigment covering their blue iris.  In fact, blue eyes can be acquired through a quick and noninvasive surgical procedure.  It is just a another reinforcement of the idea that appearance is superficial and that we are all equal.  No particular look or bodily feature is superior to another and should not be desired in place of your own to the point where you may be depressed from dissatisfaction from your appearance.  Although the iris surgery involves little risk and time, I strongly recommend not purchasing it.  This is for that same reason I hate tattoos; a person's body is uniquely made and should not be altered artificially in the effort to look more unique or different.  One of the keys to leading a happy life is to never be dissatisfied with your appearance even if it is not the desired one.  Good looks can increase confidence, but not by much because confidence is mainly a self-made entity and you are only aware of your appearance only a fraction of the time you are conscious.  Even if one is unhappy with their appearance, alterations are never necessary; appearance improves and declines exactly how money comes and goes, it is the wrong thing to be pursuing constantly and the pursuit never ends.

Sources:
The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison
http://www.stromamedical.com/page/physician-info

The Effects of Othering

Othering, or the expulsion of others socially in a hostile manner, is disgusting.  There is no other social context that dehumanizes one group more in a communal setting.  Yet, it has been and still is and inescapable flaw of society with prime examples being modern racism and gender inequality.  Women in today's society are given a preliminary judgment by others on their appearance even before a conservation is had with them.  Today, no matter what a woman wears "a woman's clothing...sends a message" (Tannen 390) what they wear always leads to the formation of predictions regarding her nature.  If she looks as if she has not tried to look good, it is considered hostile.  All of this leads to women not being considered human beings on the same plane of existence as men, but rather objects who should always maintain a pleasing or unique appearance.  The fact that in society men do not have to go through this and women do puts women in a oppressed and sub-human position.  Racism is the most common form of othering, as it effects both genders equally.  Skin color, height, appearance, clothing all affect the disposition people have towards a person.  As a "youngish black man-a broad six feet two inches with a beard and billowing hair" (Staples 205) Brent Staples was denied service because of his appearance.  A jewelry store owner "excused herself and returned with an enormous red Doberman" perceiving him as a threat and in effect, preventing Staples from a peaceful browse.  She effectively lowered Staples to a position below her by depriving him the right to be in her store.  Appearance once again made a group of people sub-human in comparison to another.  When Sherman Alexie read "Indians Lose Again" (Alexie 179) in the newspaper, he no doubt felt the impact of dehumanization as a result of how the headline inadvertently illustrated Native Americans as losers and an inferior race.  Othering has no positive use and only serves to make people feel less than human when, in reality, nothing can change the status of human.  There is no point in trying to prove a lack of humanity in a group of humans.

Sources:
"There Is No Unmarked Woman" by Deborah Tannen
"The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven" by Sherman Alexie
"Black Men and Public Space" by Brent Staples

Breaking The Bad Scarlet Letter (spoilers sorry)

After the reading the ending of the Scarlet Letter, I couldn't help but notice the similarities it had with  the ending ofmy second favorite show, Breaking Bad.  The main character of Breaking Bad, Walter White, is a mix of Dimmesdale and Chillingworth.  He is an educated man who uses his intelligence to do evil just like Chillingworth, and he lives a secret, sinful, second life like Dimmesdale.  Like Dimmesdale, Walter's life was revealed to all before his death, also Walter's death took place as soon as he ran out of targets for his malice (he ended up killing his final nemesis) similar to how Chillingworth's "evil principle was left with no further material to support it" (Hawthrone 255) .  Walter was able to leave a huge sum of money for his children before his death similar to how Chillingworth ended up setting up Pearl for life.  Hester and Walter's wife, Skyler, are both left to live lives of poverty and depression while their children progressed onward.  Also, Skyler becomes aware about Walt's actions halfway through the show and keeps helps him keep his secret unhappily, becoming a sinner just like her lover.  Also, the turing point in both stories had the couples (Hester and Dimmesdale, Skyler and Walt) almost achieving a life of total peace built on mutual agreement.  However both moments were ruined by a third party learning of their plans.  I believe that both stories ended in these dreary fashions for the same reason: to discourage behavior like that of the characters.  Stories like these are made to give more character to social deviants and layer them, explore their motivations and the circumstances that force them to such actions but sad endings remind the viewer or reader that the characters were in the wrong.  The similarities also show that limitations on how characters can be shown has stagnated.  Hawthorne would have been in quite a bit of trouble if Hester lived happily ever after or was depicted as stunningly beautiful in the place of the harsh features the original cover showed her with.  Similarly, Breaking Bad would have been perforated with controversy if Walt got away with all of his crimes and lived happily ever after despite deserving 10 lives in prison.

How you will end up looking if you sin.

Sources: The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne
Breaking Bad by Vince Gilligan

We Don't Need These Titles

One of the main points in Deborah Tannen's piece "There Is No Unmarked Woman" that stood out to me was the fact of how much a woman's title reveals about her.  The line "Women can't even fill out a form without telling stories about themselves" got me wondering whether or not these these titles are useful, and I decided they aren't.  I'm talking mainly about the social ones such as "Mr." and "Mrs./Ms.".  By mentioning the marital status of a woman, the title detracts from her social standing and this feature of the title is wholly unnecessary.  Of course, some married women prefer this way and enjoy having the title of "Mrs.", yet other women, who are no less happier with their marriage, rightfully wonder what their marital status has to do with their professional life.  Why should it matter if they are married or not?  If people believe that one should never mix their personal and professional life, then this is a valid scenario to practice that belief.  A bigger question is why does a man not have to disclose this information?  Although some may argue that married women have a choice in whether or not they change their title or use whichever one they want to; however, not using "Mrs." always causes people to jump to conclusions about the state of her marriage or her husband may not appreciate the decision.  It is for these reasons that unisexual titles such as "Esq." and "Dr." should be the norm and ones that denote marital status need to go.  They have no place in a society that prides itself in its self-proclaimed gender equality.

                                              (Also, why make it so complicated?)







Sources:
"There Is No Unmarked Woman" by Deborah Tannen
Article about professional titles-
http://www.emilypost.com/communication-and-technology/social-names-and-titles/774-professional-titles